Skip to content

Sections
Personal tools
You are here: Home Bridge News March 2008 Elaine Brown confronts the Green Party of the U.S.
donate
subscriptions
Navigation
Log in


Forgot your password?
New user?
 
Document Actions

Elaine Brown confronts the Green Party of the U.S.

by Aimée Smith, March 2008 "Bridge"

All things being equal, most members of the Green Party of the U.S. (GPUS) would prefer a long time party member as their presidential nominee. Most would like someone with name recognition. Many think it important that the nominee be a person of color. A good number think the candidate should carry a radical message.

Elaine Brown confronts the Green Party of the U.S.

Elaine Brown speaks at event commemorating Marcus Garvey [Elaine Brown website]

Elaine Brown embodied all of these criteria. She was a party member who had run for local office in Georgia. A former national chair of the Black Panther Party, she has continued actively to support U.S. political prisoners and to oppose the expanding prison-industrial complex.

So it is not surprising that she was urged by many Greens to seek the party's presidential nomination. Unfortunately, as things played out, she not only dropped out of the contest, but left the party. Other Greens have already followed her.

The rumor mill

The first problem faced by the Brown campaign was a rumor spread among the party leadership accusing her of having been a COINTELPRO agent.

COINTELPRO was the FBI COunter INTELligence PROgram which targeted a broad range of peace and civil rights groups in the 1960s and 1970s. More radical groups like the Black Panthers and American Indian Movement were infiltrated, and individuals bad-jacketed, framed and even assassinated.

Among those who propagated the FBI rumor about Brown was former Santa Monica mayor Michael Feinstein. He was also involved with the effort to draft Cynthia McKinney. The slander was sourced to unsubstantiated allegations made in private hearings held by McKinney’s office while she was a U.S. Representative.

Ironically, the spreading of such rumors is a standard tactic of COINTELPRO and covert ops like it. The aim is to develop mutual suspicion among the targets and the unwitting carriers of rumors. The life or death lesson from this COINTELPRO period is to never make claims about another activist unless you have hard proof to back it up.

Cat Woods of California, Co-chair of the GPUS Presidential Candidate Support Committee (PCSC) said, "I was told by more than one person in the party that she was a COINTELPRO agent. But I looked into it and it was purely hearsay. There was no evidence presented." The fact that Greens were participating in such behavior was a sign of, at best, extreme political naiveté or, at worst, malicious underhandedness.

The second problem emerged at last summer’s GPUS annual meeting in Reading, Pennsylvania. All announced presidential candidates were invited to a candidate forum.

Ralph Nader was not an announced candidate but was invited to address the body at an event on ballot access issues.

Cynthia McKinney was still at that time a member of the Democrat party, but was asked to host a screening of a film mostly about herself, “American Blackout.” Neither was billed as a candidate, but the crowd could be heard chanting “Run Ralph run “ and “Run Cynthia run.”

Elaine Brown did not attend the candidates forum in Reading, but did send along a statement, which the PCSC agreed to read. It slipped through the cracks and was not read at the forum. This situation strengthened the impression that certain people “need not apply” for the GPUS nomination.

The third conflict revolved around the issue of draft candidate versus declared candidate status. The PCSC rules provided a way for non-declared candidates to be included. Nader is the best known example of someone who was not a party member and had not declared his candidacy at that point. McKinney was being recruited but had not yet left the Democrat party which had repeatedly betrayed her.

The people who matter

But this flexibility, intended to afford inclusion, created the appearance of a two-tier system—one for the people who matter and the other for everyone else. Brown started out as a declared candidate, then switched to the draft candidate approach. However, when candidates were first listed on the website, she was not among them. This was perceived by Brown and her campaign as another slight. PCSC Co-chair Cat Woods explained the delay on the committee's end.

“She didn't understand that a committee vote had to follow receipt of requirements for the draft process. It was undertaken immediately, but it takes one week to vote online. There was unanimous support in favor and she was listed on the website immediately upon completion of the vote."

Appearances were not helped by the fact that the other PCSC Co-chair, Greg Gerritt of Rhode Island, admitted to contacting Brown and discouraging her from seeking the nomination.

He had a similar message for the Nader campaign, which he sent in the form of a letter identifying himself as PCSC Chair. He failed to run the contents of this letter by his committee or even the other Co-chair of his committee.

Who’s afraid of Elaine Brown

Shortly after this, an email report from staff political director Brent McMillan was forwarded to the GPUS National Committee (NC) by Steering Committee (SC) member Liz Arnone. In it McMillan reports candidly assessing Elaine Brown in extremely disparaging terms to one of her campaign volunteers. To the SC, he expressed fear for his life since Brown was, he alleged, coming to Washington to confront him; and, as he put it, “who knows which of her past associates she will send to come after me next.”

Many in the party, including Arnone, felt that McMillan’s characterizations demonstrated racist stereotypes and unfair treatment of Brown. Appeals were made to issue an apology. Instead, eight SC members drafted a letter calling for Arnone's resignation for forwarding the email to the NC list.

Greg Gerritt also chairs the Coordinated Campaign Committee and thus serves as McMillan's supervisor. He simply affirmed the contents of McMillan’s email, describing it as “measured and appropriate within a range of two or three words.” Yet he concedes he had seen no evidence that Brown intended to do anything violent.

Gerritt was asked if it was appropriate for McMillan to suggest he might be killed because Brown was allegedly coming to the national office to confront him for perceived racism. He said he couldn't comment on that. But he felt that the SC concern was justified. “Saying that you are going to come to the office and confront someone, that is something we should be protecting our employees from, too.”

The McMillan email, and SC’s failure to repudiate McMillan’s actions, proved to be the final straw. Elaine Brown sent an open letter announcing her withdrawal from the race and her decision to quit the party.

In Massachusetts, former Green-Rainbow Party Co-chair David Ebony Allen Barkley resigned all his GPUS offices. In his analysis, “[t]he Green Party has already made their decision as to who should run and who shouldn't run and who qualifies and who doesn't ... anything that is grassroots and not from established corporate parties that is coming into the party is scary to them, it’s undermining.

"So the idea that you would have people who don't vote or haven't voted following someone who was encouraging them or bringing them into the party, it was very unstabilizing for the white male psyche....”

In Greg Gerritt’s view, Brown actually “had no intention of actually putting a campaign together, but…she could not gracefully exit the race, admitting it was a bad fit for her, so she went looking for other people to blame.”

But according to Diane White, GPUS delegate from Pennsylvania and acting secretary for the Green Party Black Caucus Organizing Committee, racism is nothing new in the GPUS. She describes the frustration in the process of getting the party's Black Caucus formally recognized and off the ground.

“Black caucus members went through all the hoops to get the members, write bylaws and secure accreditation, only to be sabotaged by the implementation of GPUS Proposal #69 in 2004, which codified the GPUS SC role as overseers, reminiscent of the plantation system, rather than respecting our autonomy,” She says. “As long as this system remains in place the GPUS will have their versions of the ‘house nigga,’ but the rest of us will be handling our business.

“What was done to Elaine Brown will not be forgotten.”

Hypocritical claims of rumor mongering

Posted by OneGreen at March-11-2008 03:12
You ought to be ashamed of yourselves for printing such a reckless and maliciously untrue article. To publish an article about 'rumor mongering' that is so full of unsubstantiated and deliberately misleading rumors is the hight of hypocrisy.

As a member of the Green National Committee, I can attest that no such rumor mongering took place publicly on any official national list, nor among any of the national officers or committees. Except for a missive forwarded from Peter Camejo, which included the only reference I could find to such a rumor being spread, hardly anyone active on the national committee or among the grassroots Greens in general are even aware such a rumor was being spread. To claim this was part of some orchestrated effort by the GPUS or the national party leadership is a plain lie.

It is also a lie to state that Elaine Brown was deliberately excluded from any candidate forums, GPUS resources, or official candidate status. Elaine Brown had every opportunity to participate in the forums as other candidates and, for whatever reason, chose not to do so. Ms. Brown had every opportunity, and assistance from the GPUS, to attain the meager standards approved by the party in 2007 for official candidate status (namely either filing with the FEC as a Green, or getting 100 signatures from green party members), but failed to put forth the effort. And despite the best efforts and good will of our political director, Brent McMillan, Ms. Brown failed to exert the smallest effort to get on the primary ballot for any state, even the ones with the easiest access.

What Aimee Smith has done here is to string together a series of unrelated, and mostly inconsequential, events, blown them out of proportion and used them as a basis for her lies, attacks and propaganda. To publish an article from someone like Aimee Smith, who has repeatedly shown contempt for the truth, fairness and basic decency is very reckless of The Bridge.

You ought to be ashamed, and you owe an apology to GPUS and the individuals libeled in this smear piece.

Elaine Brown just could not pull a campaign together

Posted by Greg Gerritt at March-11-2008 10:48
Recently the Bridge published an article by Aimee Smith about the trials and travails of Elaine Brown as Ms Brown pretended to put together a campaign to run for the Green Party nomination for president. Ms Smith contends that racism in the Green Party was the reason that the Brown campaign sputtered and failed. Then again, Ms Smith accuses every one of racism whenever her favorite and pet projects fail, and this is just another one of those cases.

As noted in the recent article, Ms Smith interviewed me in my role as one of the co chairs of the Green Party Presidential Campaign Support Committee. In that role I have spoken with more than 20 potential and actual candidates for the Green Party nomination since January 2007. My job was to feel out the candidates, talk to them, see if they were capable of putting a campaign together, provide assistance to those it would do some good, and discourage those for whom a campaign for the presidential nomination would be a fiasco. I provided pretty much the same advice to all of the candidates. First I reminded them that running for president, really running for president, might be the hardest thing they ever did, and was something to be undertaken only if they really were ready for such an effort. Half the candidates dropped out right then. Then I talked with them about the nature of a grassroots low budget campaign, and what it would actually take to secure the nomination.

I spoke to candidates of all abilities, some with extensive electoral experience, some claiming the CIA had implanted electrodes in their brains and were sending them secret transmissions telling them to run. In every case, except one, the conversations were at least business like if not friendly.

When I first heard the stirrings that Elaine Brown was going to seek the nomination I reached out to her, just as I did to every candidate I heard about. I ended up speaking to Elaine Brown about 4 times over the course of her campaign, and I can honestly say they were the worst 4 conversations I had with any candidate all year. At first Greens were excited about the possibility of Elaine Brown running, she is an articulate spokesperson on a variety of issues, so I went into the calls hoping she would be a candidate. But from the first I found a person who expected things to be handed to her and who was unwilling to actually do any of the work expected of a candidate who actually wanted the nomination. More to the point, Ms Brown seemed to want to spend most of the time we talked complaining that other candidates were getting special treatment or had some inside track, none of which was true, or even remotely resembled the truth.

Over the months Greens would occasionally try to make contact with Elaine Brown to see if they could help her get her campaign going. Everyone I have talked to about those conversations found Ms Brown to be extremely difficult to talk to. She used the conversations to rant rather than organize. On the occasion that she did set up a meeting with some very active Greens in California, she showed up to the meeting intoxicated and was extremely rude to the people meeting with her.

After incidents like this the Brown campaign would disappear, until some Greens who had never talked to her decided to try getting her campaign going again. The flattery would incite her to resurrect her campaign until she actually had to do something, at which time it would fall apart again.

Two examples should provide enough information to put the accusations around the Brown campaign to rest. The first concerns the GPUS annual meeting that took place in Reading PA in July 2007. The Presidential Campaign Support Committee organized a candidates forum. Every candidate received exactly the same notices, beginning months before the event with the preliminary schedule, and a note that while the schedule was still subject to change the forum would take place on either Friday or Saturday, July 13 or 14, and that there would be plenty to do both days and that candidates would serve themselves well by being in Reading for the entire convention.

Despite receiving the exact same information as every other candidate, at exactly the same time they received it, Ms Brown complained that several candidates were getting different treatment, and she declined to participate. Her campaign disappeared again while she thunderously claimed everything was rigged against her.

Months later, as the campaign season proceeded, calls from Greens asking her to run lead her to put her campaign back together, such as it was. A critical factor in getting the nomination was getting on the ballot in the states that were holding official primaries. In order to get on the DC primary ballot a candidate had to hand in a petition with the valid signatures of 50 registered DC Greens by January. The GPUS Political Director made an effort to let every candidate know about the requirements, procedures and deadlines. McMillen then helped DC Greens organize for petitioning. All of the candidates except Elaine Brown responded in timely fashion and participated in DC petitioning efforts through intermediaries. Brown finally responded just days before the deadline, and after a series of missteps, finally sent someone to pick up the official paperwork. Brent McMillen then met with the person Ms Brown had designated as her agent, showed him how to petition, signed the petition, had others sign the petition, and gave him lists to use to get signatures.

When Brown’s agent reported to Ms Brown what had transpired she fired him and informed him that she was going to go to the office to confront Brent McMillan. Brown’s agent then called the office and told McMillan what had transpired. McMillan reported the incident to his supervisors, who asked him to work from home the day Ms Brown stated she was going to confront him at the office. McMillan, noted in his report that he was aware of Ms Brown’s confrontational history, and that she had some history of alcohol abuse.

One of McMillan’s supervisors, who both disliked McMillan, and wanted the Elaine Brown candidacy eliminated, publicized McMillan’s memo, creating a bit of a storm, the storm that Ms Smith attempts to play up in her story.

Ms Smith attempts to call the entire story of the demise of the Elaine Brown campaign racism in the GP, and racism by Brent McMillan. The reality could not be any further from the way Ms Smith tries to portrait it. The reality was that McMillan went out of his way to help Ms Brown with her campaign, that Greens did everything they could to help her get a campaign up and running, and that all of the failings of the campaign truly belong to Ms Brown who attacked everyone who tried to help her.

Running for president is very hard. Hardly anyone can really pull it off. Ms Brown was unwilling to acknowledge her own limitations and went looking for someone else to blame each time her campaign went off the tracks. Ms Smith went looking for someone else to call a racist so she could further her own political agenda.

I know how it works, scream loud, scream first, and your story goes around the world. But eventually the truth wins out. Elaine Brown did not have the capacity or personality for a successful run for the Green nomination for President, and only a person with a political vendetta like Aimee Smith would tell the story as she has.


Greg Gerritt 3/11/08

"comments of OneGreen"

Posted by bill cunningham at March-11-2008 11:14
If "OneGreen" is really on the Green Party NC, why doesn't he give his name? As for Elaine Brown not putting in the effort to get on the ballot, how she did get on the Massachusetts ballot?

Just slinging mud at the writer isn't a very convincing argument, Mr "OneGreen." Rather it seems to reinforce the author's case about the kind of stuff that goes on in the party. I'm afraid I've heard stories like this for years. That's what we get for trying to run an organization through email lists.