Skip to content

Sections
Personal tools
You are here: Home Bridge News Oct-Nov2006—issue 16 Groups challenge Feds to regulate nanoparticles at FDA hearing
donate
subscriptions
Navigation
Log in


Forgot your password?
New user?
 
Document Actions

Groups challenge Feds to regulate nanoparticles at FDA hearing

by International Center for Technology Assessment

WASHINGTON, D.C., Tuesday, October 10— Consumer products that currently contain unregulated nanoparticles, including sunscreens and cosmetics used by children and adults could pose new dangers to human health and the environment.  This week, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) holds its first-ever hearing on nanotechnology.

Today Friends of the Earth (FoE) and the International Center for Technology Assessment (CTA) challenged the FDA to protect consumers from products laced with nanoparticles.    "With hundreds of nano-laced products already on the market, this meeting is dangerously overdue," said George Kimbrell, CTA staff attorney.  "For any credibility, this hearing must cut through the industry's hype and focus on the real health and environmental risks of nanotechnology." 

This past May CTA and FoE led a broad coalition of consumer, health, and environmental groups in filing the first-ever legal petition challenging FDA's failure to address the human health and environmental risks of nanomaterials in consumer products. The petition also calls on FDA to require labeling of products containing nanomaterials, as consumers currently have no way to know which products might contain the untested ingredients. The petition is yet unanswered by FDA.  

"FDA has been sleeping at the wheel, while hundreds of sunscreen and cosmetics products have been placed on store shelves without adequate regulations and safety testing," stated Erich Pica, FoE's Domestic Campaigns Director.  "This is one of the most dramatic failures of regulation since asbestos." 

In his comments, Mr. Pica highlighted FoE's 2006 report, Nanomaterials, Sunscreens and Cosmetics: Small Ingredients, Big Risks, which lists several hundred cosmetics, sunscreens, and personal care products containing engineered nanomaterials now on market shelves.   

In addition, the groups noted that FDA had so far received several thousand public comments critical of the agency's inaction and concerned about the health and environmental risks of nanomaterials in consumer products. "The public has the right to know whether the products they buy contain nanomaterials and whether the FDA has put in place regulations to assure the safety of products containing nanoparticles," noted Jaydee Hanson, CTA Policy Director. "To date, the FDA has failed to develop a regulatory process that assures the safety of these materials or even informs consumers by requiring labeling.  The time for action is now."  

Nanotechnology 101

Nanotechnology means the design or production of structures by controlling shape and size at the nanometer (nm) scale, or one billionth of a meter.  But nano does not mean merely tiny; it is better understood to mean fundamentally different.  Engineered nanoparticles can exhibit different fundamental chemical and physical properties than their bulk material counterparts. 

Just as the size and physics properties of engineered nanoparticles give them exciting properties of strength and reactivity, those properties also give them unique and unpredictable human health and environmental risks.  For example, nanoparticles exceptionally large relative surface area creates increased surface reactivity and enhanced intrinsic toxicity.  Their small size allows nanoparticles unprecedented mobility.  Easily taken up by the human body, they cross biological membranes, cells, tissues, and organs more efficiently than larger particles.  

Once in the blood stream, nanomaterials circulate throughout the body and can be taken up by the organs and tissues including the brain, liver, heart, kidneys, spleen, bone marrow, and nervous system.  Once inside cells, they can interfere with cell signaling, cause structural damage, and damage DNA.  

Some Red Flags:

  • 2006 study shows low concentrations of manufactured nanoparticles of titanium dioxide can produce harmful free radicals in brain cells and the potential for brain cell damage.
  • 2005 study concludes engineered nanoparticles of aluminum oxide bioaccumulate and stunt the growth of roots in at least five species of plants: corn, cucumber, cabbage, carrot and soybeans.
  • 2004 study shows fullerenes or buckyballs-- a type of manufactured nanoparticle used in some cosmetics -- cause rapid brain damage in fish and are toxic to small crustaceans. 
  • 2004 study discovers that cadmium selenide nanoparticles (quantum dots) can break down in the human body potentially causing cadmium poisoning
  • 2003 study finds the effects of nanotubes on the lungs of rats produced more toxic response than quartz dust.
  • 1997 study finds that engineered nanoparticles of zinc oxide and titanium dioxide used in nano-sunscreens can induce free radicals in skin cells and cause DNA damage  

For more information

George Kimbrell, International Center for Technology Assessment, (202) 547-9359, gkimbrell@icta.org or Charles Margulis, International Center for Technology Assessment (West Coast Office), (510) 697-0615, CMargulis@icta.org Erich Pica, Friends of the Earth, 202-222-0739, epica@foe.org. CTA's legal petition and further information: www.icta.org/nanotech/index.cfm FoE's report and further information: www.foe.org/camps/comm/nanotech/index.html

Nanotechnology

Posted by Stokely Karma at September-23-2007 07:27
What will the Dr.Frankenstein vivisectionists come up with next?We are their test subjects just like the research animals.We still can't stop them from poisoning our food with GMO's,pesticides,BGH,etc.They don't even want to label the products, because they know people won't buy them.Trust your corporate government?They say it's safe and they're the experts.Give me a break please!!