Skip to content

Sections
Personal tools
You are here: Home Bridge News December 2006— issue 17— January 2007 For the dogs, it’s now or never
donate
subscriptions
Navigation
Log in


Forgot your password?
New user?
 
Document Actions

For the dogs, it’s now or never

by Carey Theil and Christine Dorchak, Esq.

Dogs play an important role in our lives. They are friends, companions, and part of our community. They are dependent on us for food, shelter and compassion, and deserve to be protected from individuals and industries that would do them harm.

That is why we must work together to end commercial dog racing, a cruel activity in which dogs are used as racing machines to generate gambling profits for wealthy racetrack owners. It is also why we must defeat the latest casino scheme by racetrack owners that is designed to keep their cruel racetrack businesses alive.

Dogs at commercial racetracks live lives of nearly endless confinement. At two racetracks in our state, more than two thousand dogs are confined in small cages barely large enough for them to stand up or turn around for long hours each day.

This photo was taken inside the Lynn Kennel Compound, which houses dogs for Wonderland. [Photo: Wonderland Greyhound Park]

Ironically, the primary release from confinement that these dogs are afforded – the few times per month when they are transferred from the kennel compound to a nearby racetrack to compete – is also wrought with peril. According to the State Racing Commission, over the past four years more than six hundred dogs have been injured while competing at commercial racetracks in Massachusetts, including dogs that suffered broken legs, cardiac arrest, seizures, spinal cord paralysis and a broken neck. Three quarters of these injuries were broken bones.

For years, grassroots volunteers and animal protection organizations have worked to end this cruelty, and are on the verge of achieving this important goal. In 2000, a ballot question to outlaw dog racing was defeated by the narrowest of margins, 51% to 49%. To defeat the proposal, wealthy racetrack owners spent nearly two million dollars on glossy television ads in an attempt to reassure voters that dog racing is somehow humane.

Earlier this year, a ballot question that would have phased out dog racing and strengthened other dog protection laws was poised to go before voters after volunteers collected over 150,000 signatures. However, at the eleventh hour the Supreme Judicial Court ruled that the measure could not be voted on due to a legal technicality.

Despite this setback, we are optimistic that voters will be given a chance in 2008 to end this animal cruelty. If they are given a chance, we believe that voters will make the compassionate choice and end commercial dog racing.

Our efforts to end dog racing, though, may be running short of time.

The same wealthy racetrack owners who have profited from this animal cruelty for decades have found a way to try to save their dying businesses: prop them up with casino gambling.

While there is no logical connection between slot machine gambling and commercial dog racing, logic has rarely stopped lobbyists and political insiders on Beacon Hill from writing laws that benefit their clients and campaign contributors. Thus a strange marriage of convenience has been forged on the casino gambling issue: lawmakers will try to give commercial racetracks the exclusive right to operate slot machines, with the caveat that the racetracks will be required by law to continue holding dog races, and if racetrack owners will agree to use millions of dollars in slot machine profits to subsidize dog breeders.

Passing this kind of backwards gambling proposal would not only legalize casino gambling in the Commonwealth, it would also guarantee that the cruelty of dog racing would continue for decades, regardless of whether racetrack owners were profiting from the races themselves or not.

Please help us defeat this cynical gambling proposal. Tell your state lawmakers that you are opposed to propping up dog racing with casino gambling profits. Then join with us to collect signatures for a ballot question in 2008 to end dog racing altogether. The dogs that are now suffering at commercial racetracks in our state don’t have a voice, and are counting on us to speak for them.

For more information on how you can help

www.grey2kusa.org

Carey Theil is executive director, and Christine Dorchak, Esq. is president of GREY2K USA

GREY2K USA is a national non-profit greyhound protection organization with more than 20,000 supporters nationwide. Based in Somerville, the group works to pass greyhound protection laws and defeat attempts to prop up commercial dog tracks.

Greyhound racing is Cruel? Think again!!!

Posted by Paul Mooney at September-23-2007 07:27
After reading your post dated 11/26/06, I felt I needed to reply to your miss leading information.
Can you tell me the name of the race track owner that was charged with any crime of being cruel to any of the greyhounds running at his or her track? I have looked and found none. Is PETA a race track owner? If so, I found a lot of those PETA race track owners were charged with crimes to animals.

You spoke of greyhounds being confined and that you are only let out a few times a month. When in fact, they are out of there crates at least four times a day for lengths of time that depends and the weather and the amount of dogs that are in the kennel. I guess the crates they sleep in are small by a humans standard but, these are their beds, they sleep on average 18 hours day. I take it form your info you have never owned a greyhound, for if you did, you would know this. I also read that in the past fours years, appor. 600 greyhounds had received some type of injury while running on the track. I'm not sure how many cards are run at both of the tracks you speak of so, I only used the numbers of what one track would normally run. Follow this if you can.
600 injuries in four years= 150 per year
8 dogs per race, 15 races per card. 8x15=120
120 dogs per card, 6 cards per week. 120x6=720
720 dogs running per week, 50 weeks out of the year 720x50=36000
36000 dogs running per year, 150 get hurt, Thats less then 1 3/4% of all the dogs that run recieve some type of injury. ( more to follow)

Greyhound racing is Cruel? Think agian part 3

Posted by Paul Mooney at September-23-2007 07:27
Your comments make it sound as if these greyhounds are not taken care of. These dogs are fed well and have vet visits monthly. Did you know that of all registered dog owner in the country, only 53% take thier dog to the vet for check ups! Maybe you should be attacking the owners of the remaining 47%.
So before you get knocked off that high stool you have perched yourself on, give your friends at PETA a call and thank them for the two guys that were caught throwing dogs in a dumpster after they killed them. Get off the tracks and do something that is going to make a differance. Feed that man with the sign. Good Luck

Number of Dogs Racing

Posted by Carey Theil at September-23-2007 07:27
Theyluv2run:

The suggestion that 36,000 dogs race each year in Massachusetts either illustrates a lack of understanding of this industry on your part, or some pretty questionable math skills.

Your equation assumes that dogs race once, and then trot off happily into the sunset. Of course, that isn't the case. They race over and over, and their risk of suffering a serious injury increases with each racing performance.

Yours,
Carey Theil

Greyhounds

Posted by greg cruz at September-23-2007 07:27
The only real truth you folks write is, dogs are mans best friend.I will take a common sense approach.Think about this, if the greyhound industry relies on the greyhound to make a living why would we abuse them? No profit there, now is there?
Greyhound Lover and owner of 25 years.
GC

Why abuse them?

Posted by GreyGuy at September-23-2007 07:27
Because there comes a point in every greyhound's career when they stop making that profit. The time from their last race to finally making it into a home. This is when the worst cases of abuse occur.

Surely you can come up with better reasons for taking good care of a dog. I know I can think of many that don't involve one single cent.

GG

Fuzzy Math

Posted by Carey Theil at September-23-2007 07:27
Theyluv2run:

The suggestion that 36,000 dogs race each year in Massachusetts either illustrates a lack of understanding of this industry on your part, or some pretty questionable math skills.

Your equation assumes that dogs race once, and then trot off happily into the sunset. Of course, that isn't the case. They race over and over, and their risk of suffering a serious injury increases with each racing performance.

Yours,
Carey Theil

Carey is Wrong

Posted by Henry Adams at September-23-2007 07:27
Why aren't you going after horse racing?

Horses are whipped, forced to run with a jockey on it's back, they are locked up 23 hours a day in a small stall, have career and life ending injuries and the ones that can't race are eatten.

You exploit bad incidents in greyhound racing and try to convince the public that it's a major problem in the industry. You misrepresent facts to mislead the public.

Greyhound racing is Cruel? Think again part 2

Posted by Paul Mooney at September-23-2007 07:27
At 1 3/4% I bet you have more traffic deaths and I'm sure based on these percentages you have more grade school kids going home or to the hospital with injuries they received on the play ground.
You did mention animal protection organizations too, I bet that track owner PETA is one of those groups you speak of. Have you made it known that PETA puts down more animals then they save? Just wondering if your a member of that group. You use the word humane and cruelty, Let me ask you, when was the last time you did a humane thing for your follow man or women? Have you ever loaded up your car with toys and drove to the poor side of town and handed them out to the kids playing on the corner? When was the last time you stopped and gave the man (with sign that read WILL WORK FOR FOOD) a few extra bucks or, did you just turn your head and act as if he wasn't there. You spoke of cruelty, If we see or think that a trainer is miss treating a dog, we will confront him or her on the matter and, if we feel the need, we will report it to the state. I bet when one of your colleagues does something unethical, you turn a blind eye and make excuses for them.

Interesting Defense

Posted by GreyGuy at September-23-2007 07:27
Why all this diversion? PETA, homeless people, children, horses, traffic accidents, etc. What does any of this have to do with greyhounds? We are talking about the only dog breed in the entire world whose usefulness runs out while they still have 10 more years to go. An entire breed, nearly 100%! Ironically, the only exceptions are those used for breeding even more greyhounds yet!

GG

Get you facts straight

Posted by Barney Adams at September-23-2007 07:27
Having a long useful life after racing is what adoption is all about. Over 90% are adopted. There are many fundraisers in the industry for adoption. Don't forget to tell that to the public - but you won't.

Grey2k is too cowardly to go after similar problems in horse racing they say exist in greyhound racing. It's not a defense. It's a legitimate question that is never answered. If there is a ballot measure in 2008 why descriminate against greyhound racing and not include horse racing in the measure.

Get your facts straight and be fair.

I agree - Grey2k's moto should be "We misrepresent facts to mislead the public"

Get your facts straight

Posted by Barney Adams at September-23-2007 07:27
Having a long useful life after racing is what adoption is all about. Over 90% are adopted. There are many fundraisers in the industry for adoption. Don't forget to tell that to the public - but you won't.

Grey2k is too cowardly to go after similar problems in horse racing they say exist in greyhound racing. It's not a defense. It's a legitimate question that is never answered. If there is a ballot measure in 2008 why descriminate against greyhound racing and not include horse racing in the measure.

Get your facts straight and be fair.

I agree - Grey2k's moto should be "We misrepresent facts to mislead the public"

Greyhounds vs Horses

Posted by GreyGuy at September-23-2007 07:27
Fact 1 - Grey2K is a GREYHOUND (as in dog) protection group.

Fact 2 - That 90% adoption number is made up.

GG

Grey2k is wrong

Posted by Barney Adams at September-23-2007 07:27
You wish the 90% figure was made up. And I'm sure you will lie to the public and won't tell the whole truth. You will tell only enough one sided stories to pull at heart strings. That is pathetic, low and cheap. Fact: tracks work with adoption agencies. Fact: there are many fundraisers for adoption.

Why should you stop with greyhounds, horses are also racing amimals.







Facts?

Posted by greenhound at September-23-2007 07:27
You're kidding right? When did Grey2K start caring about anything other than their bankroll? If Grey2K really cared about the plight of dogs and their mistreatment there are plenty of places where their work would better serve the dog community as a whole. Go by your local shelter and tell me what you see there. Call shelters across the country and tell me what you see there. Greyhounds are so selectively bred that their annual number of whelped pale in comparison to the Labrador Retriever...we're talking a fact of 10 here. That's a fact.

I assume you have a relationship with all the adoption agencies in the country and can back up your statement that 90% isn't correct. Of course the goal of adoption of any breed is 100%, but I can assure you that the greyhound's adoption rate is among the highest in the country.
-gh